Running Away from a “Record” of Success
Did Democrat’s “Panic” Lead to Mid-Term Debacle?
(For publication the week of November 17, 2014)
Now that the political pundits, analysts and campaign consultants have had their say, I thought it was time to offer a perspective on the debacle suffered by the Democrats during the recent mid-term elections. Let’s get right to it. In the face of a calculated and relentless assault by Republicans on Barack Obama, a President with a dismal approval rating, Democratic candidates panicked and frantically ran away from the President and his/their “record” over the past six years.
As most analysts have correctly pointed out, mid-term elections have traditionally been unkind to the President and Party in power. A loss of seats in the House and Senate is not unusual. It was also a particularly difficult year for the Democrats because they had to defend so many Senate seats in red States. However, the difficult political terrain does not explain the magnitude of the debacle, the rout, the bloodbath the Democrats suffered – including the scare in Virginia where Mark Warner barely survived, the loss of Governors in deeply blue states and major gains by Republicans in State legislatures around the country. It was brutal!
I am not a professional pundit or political consultant but, I do have a perspective on why the Democrats lost control of the Senate and suffered unusually high casualties in other offices. They focused almost exclusively on “turn-out,” instead of “message” and “turn-out.” Ducking and running from the President or his/their record was not a “message” likely to motivate the base or a sufficient number of independent voters to “turn-out” in the numbers necessary to stem the tide of what became a red wave of political destruction for the Democrats.
Several questions are in order in this regard. How in the face of a steadily improving economy did Democrats lose so badly? The unemployment rate has gradually come down to 5.8% with increases in jobs in the 200,000 plus range for several months – not spectacular but in the right direction. The stock market is breaking records, and even though this has mostly benefitted wealthy interests, the 501k plans of workers and middle class people have also recovered from the disastrous losses of the Great Recession. Gas prices are low and continuing to decline, a factor which usually brings relief to working people.
And, why did the Democrats run away from rather than tout the current and future impact of the Affordable Care Act? Despite a bungling roll-out, the fact is that millions of Americans who previously lacked access to affordable health care now have it. And, what about the Affordable Care Act’s impact on the deficit? Remember what a big issue the deficit has been for the Republicans in recent years? The fact is that the Affordable Care Act has slowed the escalating cost of health care and contributed to a significant reduction in the deficit. Moreover, President Obama’s “policies” have significantly contributed to the reduction of the deficit because the recovering economy is generating more tax revenue to pay the bills. Little wonder you heard not a peep from the Republicans about the deficit. But, you didn’t hear the good news from the Democrats either. They were shell shocked!
In 2012 the economy was in much worse condition than it is today. By conventional wisdom, President Obama should have been soundly defeated. In my conversations with Rev. Mark Thompson, Host of Make It Plain on SIRIUS XM radio, I suggested that if President Obama could convince enough voters that his policies were pushing the economy in the right direction, he would be re-elected. Obama’s positive messaging on the economy and other matters plus a masterful turn-out strategy carried the day. He was re-elected despite much higher unemployment/joblessness than is currently the case. Because enough voters were hopeful that conditions would get better, they defied conventional wisdom and re-elected President Obama!
Today’s economy is better, but there is a legitimate complaint that the recovery is plagued by low wage jobs and wage stagnation. Hence, the argument goes that people are sour on the direction of the economy and Obama. Under these circumstances, it was critical that the President and the Democrats create an overarching narrative that reminded the American people which Party’s policies wrecked the economy, creating the pain in the first place. And, with millions of people out of work, which Party fought time and time again for extensions in unemployment benefits that eased the pain over the strident objection of most Republicans. While wages are stagnant, the American people needed to be reminded that it was/is President Obama and the Democrats who have repeatedly called for an increase in the minimum wage over the objection of most Republicans. This is a proposal that had traction because voters in five states, including a red state like Arkansas, passed referenda supporting increasing the minimum wage. Nonetheless, in Arkansas, Mark Pryor, the Democrat who favored the minimum wage, lost decisively to his Republic opponent.
How is this possible? While local/state issues are obviously important, and candidates must conduct good campaigns, as a general proposition, Democrats like Pryor lacked a message that connected the reality of an improving but sluggish economy to a positive agenda for lifting workers and the middle class out of the doldrums of wage stagnation. The ideas are there, e.g., pressing for infrastructure repair, greens jobs and policies which discourage corporations from shifting jobs abroad. These are all ideas which the Republicans have consistently resisted and obstructed within the legislative process – a fact which the Democrats also failed to drive home. Gridlock in Washington was a major issue in the election, yet it was the perpetrators, the obstructionists, whom the voters rewarded with victory.
The lessons of the Democratic debacle should be clear: there is always a need for a message, a compelling narrative to motivate voters to turn-out. For the Democrats this should mean consistently articulating people-oriented, progressive values, principles and policies; ideas that have been consistently opposed by conservative Republicans. Voters need to be clear about which Party is on the side of workers, the middle class and poor people. Candidates must have the courage to run on rather than from a record of success in order to give people a reason to vote. In the words of the Rev. Jesse L. Jackson, you have to “keep hope alive!” President Obama and the Democrats failed to do that in the mid-term elections. “Demographic advantages” notwithstanding, if Democrats fail to tout successes and offer a message/vision for the future in 2016, the consequences could be fatal. If there is no vision, the Party will perish!
Dr. Ron Daniels is President of the Institute of the Black World 21st Century and Distinguished Lecturer at York College City University of New York. His articles and essays also appear on the IBW website www.ibw21.org and www.northstarnews.com . To send a message, arrange media interviews or speaking engagements, Dr. Daniels can be reached via email at info@ibw21.org
